High Court: Norfolk Council Will Refund Millions After Discriminated Against Vulnerable People

High Court: Norfolk Council Will Refund Millions After Discriminated Against Vulnerable People

By Gabriel Princewill-

Norfolk County Council  have landed themselves in hot water, and will have to repay millions to the county’s most vulnerable people after a High Court judge ruled it had discriminated against them in changes to its disability support.

In a  shocking revelation, over 4,000 disabled people were forced to pay more for their adult social care after the council agreed to change its minimum income guarantee in a cost-cutting measure.

Capeesh Restaurant

AD: Capeesh Restaurant

The decision drew wide criticism at the time, with several attempts made by council representatives to open talks with cabinet members who arrogantly rebuffed the idea of dialogue.

Eventually, a disillusioned  mother of a young woman with Down syndrome took the decision to launch a lengthy legal challenge, which saw the council taken all the way to the High Court,  exposing the Council’s indiscretions in the process.

Unlawful

Oysterian Sea Food Restaurant And Bar

AD: Oysterian Sea Food Restaurant And Bar

A High Court judge on Friday ruled that the council had acted unlawfully in its decision to change the way it calculates care cost, exposing the council as a law breaker.  The ruling leaves the council with egg on its face.

Multiple British Councils have been found wanting in 2020, following investigations by regulatory bodies and court cases over serious breaches of varying kinds. Councils are meant to be the arm of government and act with honour and dignity, respecting the law in all their engagements. Too often their incompetence makes mockery of their otherwise privileged position.

British Councils  are equipped with their own legal departments, but are believed to often appoint relatively cheap wishy washy lawyers with limited knowledge of the law to save money.

In many cases, council officials choose not to consult their legal representatives when taking consequential decisions, recklessly presumptuous that no legal challenges will be brought against them. This time, Norfolk Council, normally a reasonably competent in many of their other endeavours, messed up big time.

The overjoyed woman described the ruling as ‘the best early Christmas’, and is being celebrated for her courageous decision.

Difficult

The mother, who can not be named for legal reasons, said: “Like many people, we have had a most difficult 10 months with the majority of that time spent shielding for safety reasons and this burden on top has been a very added stress for us.

“Not only us and all the members of Disability Network Norfolk Group, who formed for mutual support to fight these unfair charges, but groups across the county and the country who have been so supportive of our situation, can take heart and note and know we have been vindicated.

“It has been a long, hard struggle on top of our very busy, more complicated and tiring roles as it is, without the added stress of these extra charges.”

Refund

In the wake of the ruling, the council has vowed to refund every individual that was overcharged for the same reasons as the claimant – estimated to be around 3,200 people. The cost of the refunds could run into millions of pounds.

Bill Borrett, the Conservative-led council’s cabinet member for adult social services, said: “I absolutely regret that people were charged the wrong amount and am very sorry for the distress this has caused.

“We have no intention of appealing the judge’s decision and we will now get on with sorting out this issue. We will be contacting all the relevant service users and any overpayment will be refunded in full.”

The proposals faced fierce opposition at the time, with protesters picketing the council meeting ahead of it being voted on and widespread petitions.

But Mr Borrett said: “I think people not wanting a change to happen and a change not being fair are two different things. We have to take a view that we have to offer the best we can with what is available to us.

“We do not have an unlimited budget and as a result, we have to make difficult decisions – if we did we would not be here today.

“In his judgment, the judge said that our charging policy was discriminatory but in an ‘unintended and unforeseen way’.

“I will be bringing forward proposals for how to rectify this situation to the next meeting of cabinet.”

The woman, who said she was “over the moon” thanked opposition councillors for their support throughout.

Steve Morphew, leader of the Labour group, told The Eye Of Media.Com   the cost of refunding people would  inevitably run into millions – and that the pain caused could have been avoided.

“Time and again we have said how cruel, callous, unfair, unjust, inhumane and damaging this was,” he said.

“Time and again families have pleaded with Conservative cabinet members to listen, but even getting them to meet has been a real struggle. ”

Stefan Aquarone, who leads the Lib Dem group, added: “It feels like the administration is almost principally opposed to the idea of those with the greatest need getting more support.

“They have forced people with disabilities to have to fight for two years, with the time and expense of going to court, to get the right to be treated as we would all expect – to live a normal life.

“The council says it wants people to live independently, but then withdraws the  money that enables them to do so.”

Heritage And Restaurant Lounge Bar

AD: Heritage And Restaurant Lounge Bar

Spread the news