Paedo University Researcher Nicholas Beleke Escapes Jail

Paedo University Researcher Nicholas Beleke Escapes Jail

By Lucy Caulkett-

A paedo university researcher , Nicholas Beleke, escaped jail after 16 images and movies of child pornography  was found on his computer.

Cops badged into Nicholas Beleke ‘s  home in Barley, Leeds , with a warrant to search his home ms seize his computer. The aspiring professor had some category A images classes as the most serious level of offending.

The top pervert had file sharing equipment fitted unto his computer, and police confirmed Beleke had shared the material with others. Shockingly, he was spared  jail.

Beleke’ s lawyer , Ashleigh  Metcalfe told Leeds Crown Court that he is highly intelligent and had links to Universities in Leeds , Glasgow  and  Nottingham, and hoped to become a professor . The ckut also had that he achieved a  P.H.D in France .

The fact Nicholas Beleke  had voluntarily referred himself to a treatment programme designed to address his offending ,was taking into account by the judge in sparring him jail.
.

COMMUNITY ORDER

Instead, the researcher  was given a 2 year community order and placed on a sex offenders treatment, which the weirdo had volunteered to attend anyway. Sentences like this one question the justice system. Beleke should have been jailed and made an example of.

Accomplished individuals who stoop below  the boundaries of decent morality must necessarily forfeit whatever career they are pursuing.

Nicholas Bekeke is aware of the massive problem of child abuse that often accompanies paedophilia activity. His high intelligence should work against him, not for him.

Those who partake of and encourage such unacceptable and depraved activity should lose whatever respect or rewards that may flow from their academic or professional achievements.

Otherwise, they could one day abuse their position o trust and commit worse offences to unsuspecting victims.

NO RELEVANCE

Academic achievement has no relevance to the offence of Pedophilia. Proper justification for treating an accomplished academic differently from any other citizen who has committed the same offence is crucial .

Equal punishment for offenders is central to all court of laws . Special treatment affords the judge more authority than permitted by the law, and this is wrong.

Judge Mashtaq Khoktar said in his concluding comments :

” I am not going to disrupt the progress you have made by dealing with the problem by sending you to custody   If it can be resolved, it should be resolved.”.

Judge Khotar should be told that punishment for an offence should be prescribed by law with no exceptions .