By Tony O’Relly-
The British Transport Secretary has defended the prime minister in light of recent published picture of Johnson with a glass of alcoholic drink during lockdown.
Grant Shapp argued that Mr Johnson had only “popped down” to toast departing communications chief Lee Cain on November 13 2020, saying he was not partying.
AD: Capeesh Restaurant
Mr Shapps pointed to Mr Johnson’s red ministerial box being present in the images as he claimed to Sky News the Prime Minister was “clearly not” partying. He said :“It looks to me like he goes down on his way out of the office and thanks the staff and raises a glass, and doesn’t in his mind recognise it as a party,” Mr Shapps said.
Transport Secretary Grant Sharp told Good Morning Britain that the prime minister was mortified by the latest revelation , but did not believe he broke lockdown rules.
The leaving do in question took place just days after the Prime Minister had ordered England’s second national lockdown.
AD: Oysterian Sea Food Restaurant And Bar
Mr Johnson, who the Transport Secretary claimed was “mortified” by the latest revelations, was facing fresh allegations he lied to Parliament after ITV News published the images.
“It looks to me like he goes down on his way out of the office and thanks the staff and raises a glass, and doesn’t in his mind recognise it as a party,” Mr Shapps said.
The Transport Secretary told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme he was “angry” to see the images, but sought to explain why Mr Johnson was not fined over that event.
He said he presumes the Prime Minister “comes in and out pretty quick, which is presumably why the police have not issued a fixed-penalty notice to the Prime Minister for that event”.
London Mayor Sadiq Khan was among those calling for Scotland Yard to explain why Mr Johnson only received a single fine for breaching lockdown rules with his 56th birthday gathering.
The Labour politician told Today “the police should explain why they reached their conclusions and provide that clarity” in order to command public confidence.
The Liberal Democrats have urged the Independent Office for Police Conduct to examine the Met’s Operation Hillman inquiry into events in No 10 and Whitehall.
But Mr Shapps said the Met does not need to explain its rationale, saying: “I don’t think the police should provide running commentaries, no.”
He insisted to ITV’s Good Morning Britain the Prime Minister “did not knowingly lie” to Parliament when he repeatedly denied rule-breaking parties took place in No 10.
Mr Shapps said he could not comment on reports suggesting Mr Johnson told Ms Gray in their controversial meeting earlier this month that there is no need for her to publish her report following the police investigation.
“I wasn’t in the room so I don’t know that’s the case,” the Transport Secretary told Sky.
Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross demanded the Prime Minister explain why he believed his behaviour was “acceptable” when most people would think the pictsuggested the Prime Minister may not have been fined over the event because he left the leaving do “pretty quick”.
Scotland Yard was also facing calls to explain why Mr Johnson was not fined over that event when photos showed him, drink in hand, by a table strewn with food and wine bottles.
There were at least eight other people in the room at a time when people were banned from social mixing, other than to meet one person outside, and at least one individual has received a fine over an event on that date.
Mr Shapps pointed to Mr Johnson’s red ministerial box being present in the images as he claimed to Sky News the Prime Minister was “clearly not” partying.
“It looks to me like he goes down on his way out of the office and thanks the staff and raises a glass, and doesn’t in his mind recognise it as a party,” Mr Shapps said.
The Transport Secretary told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme he was “angry” to see the images, but sought to explain why Mr Johnson was not fined over that event.
He said he presumes the Prime Minister “comes in and out pretty quick, which is presumably why the police have not issued a fixed-penalty notice to the Prime Minister for that event”.
London Mayor Sadiq Khan was among those calling for Scotland Yard to explain why Mr Johnson only received a single fine for breaching lockdown rules with his 56th birthday gathering.
The Labour politician told Today “the police should explain why they reached their conclusions and provide that clarity” in order to command public confidence.
The Liberal Democrats have urged the Independent Office for Police Conduct to examine the Met’s Operation Hillman inquiry into events in No 10 and Whitehall.
Mr Shapps said the Met does not need to explain its rationale, saying: “I don’t think the police should provide running commentaries, no.”
He insisted to ITV’s Good Morning Britain the Prime Minister “did not knowingly lie” to Parliament when he repeatedly denied rule-breaking parties took place in No 10.
Mr Shapps was unable to refute reports suggesting Mr Johnson told Ms Gray in their controversial meeting earlier this month that there is no need for her to publish her report following the police investigation.
“I wasn’t in the room so I don’t know that’s the case,” the Transport Secretary told Sky.
Mr Johnson was facing fresh pressure from Conservatives over the latest revelations.
Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross demanded the Prime Minister explain why he believed his behaviour was “acceptable” when most people would think the pictures showed “unjustifiable and wrong” behaviour.
Conservative MP David Simmonds said he was awaiting the Gray report but that it will be “very difficult” for Mr Johnson to explain how he did not mislead Parliament.
“Clearly it does raise a new question that we were all told very clearly that there definitely had not been a party on the day in question and these photographs have emerged which suggest that that’s not the case,” the backbencher told Today.
“It seems to me he could construct some defence about how people were at work, but we need to see this in context. Many of my constituents lost relatives, they lost friends and family members, my father-in-law died of Covid.”ures showed “unjustifiable and wrong” behaviour.
“Clearly it does raise a new question that we were all told very clearly that there definitely had not been a party on the day in question and these photographs have emerged which suggest that that’s not the case,” the backbencher told Today.
“It seems to me he could construct some defence about how people were at work, but we need to see this in context. Many of my constituents lost relatives, they lost friends and family members, my father-in-law died of Covid.”
AD: Heritage And Restaurant Lounge Bar