By Aaron Miller-
The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the Trump administration cannot carry out its plan to shut down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.
The programme has allowed nearly 800,000 young people, known as Dreamers, to avoid deportation and remain in the U.S.
AD: Capeesh Restaurant
The Deferred Action Programme is a United States immigration policy that allows some individuals with unlawful presence in the United States after being brought to the country as children to receive a renewable two-year period of deferred action from deportation and become eligible for a work permit in
Chief Justice John Roberts was the swing vote in the 5-4 decision, which deals a big legal defeat to President Donald Trump on the issue of immigration, a major focus of his domestic agenda.
Roberts wrote in the decision that the government failed to give an adequate justification for ending the federal program. The administration could again try to shut it down by offering a more detailed explanation for its action, but the White House might not want to end such a popular program in the heat of a presidential campaign.
AD: Oysterian Sea Food Restaurant And Bar
‘I’m relieved’: DACA recipient reacts to Supreme Court decision to uphold protections
The written judgement by Robert on behalf of the majority by the liberal Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor.
“We conclude that the acting secretary did violate” the Administrative Procedure Act, and that the decision to rescind DACA “must be vacated,” In his decision, Roberts called the Trump administration’s “total rescission” of DACA “arbitrary and capricious.”
The decision claimed that Trump had broken the laws governing federal agencies when he ended DACA in 2017 because the memorandum that recommended its termination did not address crucial parts of the policy.
In addition, every justice in the majority except Sotomayor dismissed the argument made by the parties that brought the case to the Supreme Court that the administration’s decision to terminate DACA was motivated by discrimination against Latinos.
Critically, however, Roberts pointed out in his decision that it wasn’t necessarily unconstitutional for the Trump administration to terminate DACA, but the way it did so was.
The chief justice pointed out toward the end of his opinion that the administration’s Department of Homeland Security could simply revisit its legal strategy on how to unwind DACA in the future.
“The appropriate recourse is therefore to remand to DHS so that it may reconsider the problem anew,” Roberts wrote.
The conservative Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh filed opinions that concurred with parts of the majority as well as with parts of the dissent — with several emphasizing that the majority ruling simple punted the issue back to the administration.
“The Court still does not resolve the question of DACA’s rescission,” Alito wrote in his dissent. “Instead, it tells the Department of Homeland Security to go back and try again.”
Dissenting, Thomas wrote, “Today’s decision must be recognized for what it is: an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision.” He added that the court “could have made clear” that a solution to the question over the status of the program must come from Congress through immigration legislation.
“Instead, the majority has decided to prolong DHS’ initial overreach by providing a stopgap measure of its own,” he wrote. “In doing so, it has given the greenlight for future political battles to be fought in this Court rather than where they rightfully belong — the political branches.”
Moments after the decision came down, Trump criticised the court ruling, by retweeting a screenshot of that part of Thomas’ dissent. The president later tweeted:
“These horrible & politically charged decisions coming out of the Supreme Court are shotgun blasts into the face of people that are proud to call themselves Republicans or Conservatives,” and asked, “Do you get the impression that the Supreme Court doesn’t like me?”
Trump also said recent court decisions showed the need for new justices, adding that he would release a list of potential nominees by Sept. 1.
Decisions
These horrible & politically charged decisions coming out of the Supreme Court are shotgun blasts into the face of people that are proud to call themselves Republicans or Conservatives. We need more Justices or we will lose our 2nd. Amendment & everything else. Vote Trump 2020!
“The American people deserve to have the Nation’s laws faithfully executed as written by their representatives in Congress — not based on the arbitrary decisions of a past administration,” Wolf said in a statement. “This ruling usurps the clear authority of the executive branch to end unlawful programs.”
The Supreme Court’s decision was widely met with praise from various Democratic lawmakers, business leaders, immigrants and advocacy groups.
Victory
Political rival,Joe Biden, called the ruling a victory that was “made possible by the courage and resilience of hundreds of thousands of DACA recipients who bravely stood up and refused to be ignored.”
Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee, vowed, if elected, to “immediately work to make it permanent by sending a bill to Congress on Day One of my administration.”
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., choked up on the Senate floor moments after the Supreme Court announced its decision.
Schumer said he “cried tears of joy” and called the decision, as well as the court’s ruling Monday that existing federal law forbids job discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or transgender status, “a bright ray of sunshine.”
“Who would’ve thought,” he said repeatedly, remarking “wow” several times.
Apple CEO Tim Cook lauded the decision, tweeting, “We’re glad for today’s decision and will keep fighting until DACA’s protections are permanent.”
U.S. Chamber of Commerce CEO Thomas Donohue called the ruling “the right decision for Dreamers, our economy, and our country,” adding that removing DACA recipients “would deny our country talent, future leaders, and an essential piece of the American workforce including teachers, nurses, doctors, farmers, and entrepreneurs.”
Explanation
Advocates of the DACA’s had argued that federal law required the Trump administration to give a detailed explanation before trying to shut the program down — an action that would affect hundreds of thousands of people and the businesses that employ them. Instead, they said, the government simply declared the program illegal.
Over 100 business groups, including Apple and Microsoft, sought to preserve DACA, arguing many of their employees are part of the program.
Immigration lawyers told the Supreme Court after the case was argued last fall that front-line health care workers involved in responding to the coronavirus epidemic rely on about 27,000 DACA recipients, “including dentists, pharmacists, physician assistants, home health aides, technicians” and nearly 200 medical students.
“Termination of DACA during this national health emergency would be catastrophic,” they said in an April 2 court filing. The Association of American Medical Colleges told the court last fall — well before the pandemic crisis — that the U.S. is unprepared “to fill the loss that would result if DACA recipients were excluded from the health care workforce.”
AD: Heritage And Restaurant Lounge Bar