By Gabriel Princewill-
A Special professional Team is to engage Alabama And Northern Ireland Lawmakers in an Abortion Debate.
A special team from the Eye Of Media’s thinktank is to engage Alabama and Northern Ireland lawmakers on the raging debate that has lead to protests over strict anti abortion laws that compel rape victims to keep their child.The team today sent several hours in West London evaluating the best blend to address the issue, including a logical and defensible analysis where an exemption for rape can be made for abortions, in the face of abundant evidence that the woman has been raped.
Strict religious views reject such exceptions, many claiming that ‘God can do great things through a rape victim’. Value judgements like these will face close logical scrutiny with many in the team poised to argue such a position to be irrational. The appraisal to be compiled into a report could take weeks or months to complete. The White House and few Alabama lawmakers have been informed about the proposal, but will not comment officially about it at this stage.
The team comprises of two lawyers, a psychologist, two researchers, and five selected members of the Eye Of Media.Com writing team, including the editor. The idea is to formulate a comprehensive report that proposes the best way to solve the legal abortion crisis rocking both America and Northern Ireland.
America has been hit by a wave of new laws in many parts that that heavily against a woman’s rights in relation to her body, causing uproar among pro abortionists. The new thinking has been ignited by the ideology of the Trump administration who are anti abortion due to a belief that supports the sanctity of life. This view is mainly supported by religious groups who are firmly against the idea of abortion. U.S president, Donald Trump has always been very bold and radical with his religious convictions, going as far as declaring Israel the capital of Jerusalem in the first year of his administration.
Although widely criticised by numerous critics, the U.S president has been celebrated by Evangelicals in America, much the displeasure of those who resent him and his policies. The team will examine the policy wider issues of abortion from the perspective of the sanctity of life strongly asserted by religious groups, and probe the essence of that starting point from the
Complexities surrounding the debate comes from the split between opposing sides of the argument on this important and delicate issue. Abortionists are strong in the view that a woman has the sole right to determine what she does with her body, whilst anti abortionists point strongly to the rights of the unborn child whose fate must in their view, be taken out of the woman’s hands. One strand of the debate is the stage at which a foetus is formed, but most women still believe it should be their choice to decide what to do with their body.
The team today sent several hours in West London evaluating the best blend to address the issue, including a logical and defensible analysis where an exemption for rape can be made for abortions, in the face of abundant evidence that the woman has been raped. Strict religious views reject such exceptions, many claiming that ‘God can do great things through a rape victim’. Value judgements like these will face close logical scrutiny with many in the team poised to argue that such a position is irrational.
TRAUMA
Psychologists will stress the mental trauma to women forced to ensure 9 months of pregnancy and the rights perpetrators of rape have successfully claimed to see their rape victims. Lawyers will examine the logical reasoning behind any conceivable bar to abortion and examine rape in the context of such rationale. It is the first time such a proposal would be made , with The Supreme Court in the U.S to be provided with a copy of the final report when it is completed. The team will engage the courts in the Uk, Northern Ireland, and the U,S in the wide and potentially groundbreaking move.
All professional participants are remaining anonymous for now, but will be made public in the event of a breakthrough in policy which will not be easy.
STALE MATE
The difference of opinion will always be stale mate, neither side will shift in their view on such a topic. As strong as each side feels on their view, it is an opinion. However, the question of opinion becomes weaker when the issue of rape comes into the equation. It is almost unthinkable for any reasonable person to believe that a woman who is raped should be forced to keep the child because of the sanctity of life, but the question will be whether the life of a child caused by raped should be treated with sanctity or seen as borne by abuse.
The scar and trauma of a rape experience can be a life sentence in itself, one far worsened by having to have the child who may have an uncanny resemblance to the rapist. Strict anti abortionists have this element as an inescapable point of reason, but will not want to complicate the problem by allowing abortion for rape victims in a way that could encourage complaints of rape. The team have agreed that one problem from the perspective of hard core anti-abortionists is that if an exception of abortion is made for a select group, complications could arise which will cause those who fall outside the group to find corrupt ways to joint that group.
Also, rape cases can take a long time to occur, posing challenges for a justification to abort under the rule of anti abortion states. It will be an arduous task proposing a successful framework, but one the team is prepared to take on board