By Ashley Young-
Princes Diana’s former bodyguard Ken Wharfe, has launched a biased attack against Prince Harry’s decision to move to the USA picking a ‘normal life’ over Royal family.
The former bodyguard came out criticizing the Duke Of Sussex for leaving the royal family, suggesting he would regret it, and could end up running back if their business ventures eventually fail.
AD: Capeesh Restaurant
Wharf did not address the several issues that led to Prince Harry’s decisions, highest of all being his distress with a lack of intervention in his family intervening in his grievances with the press, or his concern that his wife felt suicidal. The absence of such relevant issues featuring in his comments makes his decision to go public with his views a call for attention and publicity or a desire to please the royals and all those upset with prince Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle.
Analysts at The Eye Of Media.Com have already concluded both of Prince Harry’s main issues to have been complex and tricky, since the royal family traditionally don’t interfere with press reports about them.
Meghan’s complaints of feeling suicidal should have been addressed, but but would have been very difficult, and near impossible for the royal family to get an outside entity to be involved in such sensitive and private issues in the royal family at the time.
AD: Oysterian Sea Food Restaurant And Bar
Critics analyzing the queue of commentators and royal associates airing their views about the royal fallout through the media, believe Mr. Wharfe is jumping on the bandwagon for public attention or favour.
”You have to ask yourself why all these anti Harry and Meghan people come to air their views in the press, without commenting or examining the reasons they left”, mental health analyst Deon Vernhoven told this publication .How he came to be sharing his views with a magazine tells you that either he approached them, or they approached him, but his views, like so many others, lack substance. It looks lie a publicity thing, and many of those jumping on the bandwagon don’t actually realize how obvious it is to those critically analyzing them.
Only journalists really have a reason to be giving their views through the media, and even some of them are doing it for attention. A lot of these people don’t understand they are only contributing to worsening Prince Harry’s mental health problems because every time he is aware of this kind of coverage, he will know they are biased, because they are. They don’t give a complete picture of the real problem.”
Mr. Wharf told New Idea magazine: “Now trapped in La La land, what happens when the Hollywood trappings run dry?”
He added: “Will the palace welcome back their Prince? – of course – with or without his wife.”Ken speculates that Harry wouldn’t have wanted to quit royal life when he moved out of the UK with his wife and young son, but had his hand forced.
Wharf indicated that Harry and Meghan were shown the door in terms of having official royal titles when The Queen refused to grant them a hybrid arrangement.
Wharf’s interview was also covered by The Mirror, and will contribute to influencing public opinion more negatively against Prince Harry than it already is. The tension between the Duke and Duchess Of Sussex and the royal family, and the way the press has been covering the tension, is one of those topics closely being evaluated by a number of professionals on a weekly, and sometimes monthly basis.
AD: Heritage And Restaurant Lounge Bar