By Sheila Mckenzie-
Prince Harry’s wedding to Meghan Markle was opposed by enough royals to create suspicion of ongoing discontent from within, being sparked by sections of the media, psychologist has claimed.
An article published by The Sun Newspaper on Sunday revealed that Prince Phillip warned against Harry marrying the former U.S actress. Other reports have claimed that Harry’s brother, Prince William, also warned Prince Harry to be weary of Meghan’s motives before the pair went ahead to tie the knot.
Since their marriage, Markle has been subjected to numerous attacks from internet trolls and also the mainstream media, sufficient to suspect an ongoing disapproval of their marriage in some circles. Outright racist attacks of the former U.S actress on twitter this year has received very limited criticism by the press or commentators, revealing a quite disapproval of her marriage to Prince Harry.
AD: Capeesh Restaurant
INTIMATE
Intimate revelations by the media of past internal disapproval of Meghan as a wife to Harry is information the public can do with knowing. It falls under freedom of expression and the ‘the right to know’, but also raises genuine questions as to whether some members of the press and commentators want to either frustrate the pair’s marriage or create dislike for Markle.
Although it is useful to know what various members of the royal family felt about Prince Harry’s choice of a wife in Meghan Markle, some who are carefully observing media reports of the couple are questioning why certain information is released to the press, and what they intend to achieve from it. Why the hostile reporting against Markle?
AD: Oysterian Sea Food Restaurant And Bar
Perhaps there is some secret unknown negative character about Meghan that only a select few know, but nothing clear and direct in the way of bad character has yet been revealed. Unless I have missed it.
CRITICISM
The Eye Of Media.Com recently criticized Britain’s best selling paper, The Sun, for potentially stirring up division between U.S president Donald Trump and Meghan Markle by asking the president what he thought of a comment made by Markle in which she accused Trump of being misogynistic.
More worrying is that when confronted with our query with their publication, the paper’s news desk offered no defense, except to cite ”an editorial decision” for the approach.
The psychologists who has insisted on anonymously said:”It appears sections of the press are deliberately trying to whip up public disapproval against this young couple’s marriage. Referring to the article in which Trump was questioned about Markle’s comments in a way that led to him calling her ”nasty”, the female psychologist said:
”The Sun Newspaper must have known Trump would react in a way that would deepen divisions between Trump and Markle, and probably wanted to achieve that objective. It was very unprofessional of them. The media should act responsibly and not stir up unnecessary friction that cannot be defended”.
CAUGHT
Only last month, The Daily Express was caught by this publication fabricating detrimental quotes from a relationship health expert against the royal couple. When confronted, the both the paper and online editor had no defense for the scandalous act by one of their journalists, and refused to pull the article down in the face of clear facts that it was filled with made up lies.
Journalists and editors need to improve their standards of reporting in all aspects and observe integrity and principle when spreading information and news.
P.S: There is no suggestion that the Sun Newspaper as an organisation referred to in this articles disapproves of Prince Harry’s Wedding To Meghan.
Neither is there any suggestion that The Daily Express as an organisation disapproves to Prince Harry’s wedding to Meghan Markle. The suggestion by the author is that there appears to be disapproval of the royal marriage by some members of the press who may be pursuing an unjustified agenda against the couple.
AD: Heritage And Restaurant Lounge Bar