By Ben Kerrigan-
The Metropolitan Police has expressed regret over the arrests of six anti-monarchy protesters on Coronation day, an implied apology over the arrests.
Republic chief executive Graham Smith, who was among the group, said he has now received a personal apology from police officers.
AD: Capeesh Restaurant
He said he did not accept the apology and would take legal action after no charges were brought against him.
The Met also confirmed it had used a controversial new law to detain the group.
Mr Smith said a chief inspector and two other officers visited his Reading home on Monday evening to issue the apology.
AD: Oysterian Sea Food Restaurant And Bar
He told PA news agency: “They seemed rather embarrassed to be honest.
“I said for the record I won’t accept the apology. We have a lot of questions to answer and we will be taking action.”
Mr Smith, who is from Bristol, earlier said he wanted a “full inquiry” into the “disgraceful episode”.
The apology suggests the Met erred in its decision to arrest the group.
The Met said a review found there was no proof the six protesters, who were detained when their vehicle was stopped near the procession route, were planning to “lock on”, a protesting tactic which is now banned.
Protest to obstruct the coronation constitutes a breach of the peace.
However, Graham Smith claims to have been in talks with the police leading up to the coronation.
Recent changes to the law, passed last week, make it illegal for protesters to use equipment to secure themselves to things like railings.
The Met said the group of six were detained after items were found in a vehicle which officers “had reasonable grounds to believe could be used as lock on devices”.
The force said it was “unable to prove intent to use them to lock on and disrupt the event”, but clearly perceived this to be the case.
One man in the group was also arrested for possession of a knife or pointed article.
The Met said it was “not clear at the time” to the arresting officers that “at least one of the group stopped had been engaging with police” about holding a lawful protest prior to the Coronation.
“We regret that those six people arrested were unable to join the wider group of protesters in Trafalgar Square and elsewhere on the procession route,” a statement continued.
Now it has said all six people have had their bail cancelled and confirmed no further action will be taken.
Mr Smith said earlier on Monday that he had spent months consulting with officers about his group’s protest plans, and said in a statement on Twitter that his group would be “speaking to lawyers about taking legal action”.
He said he had been held for 16 hours on the morning of the Coronation after being stopped by officers who suspected him and group members of carrying “lock on” devices to tie themselves to inanimate objects.
“They also said they had intelligence, which is untrue,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
“If they did have intelligence their intelligence officers are either lying or incompetent because there was never any discussion, thought, email, message, anything that suggested any intent to do anything disruptive.”
Intentions
Mr Smith added that, after months of discussions with the Met, the force had “repeatedly said, right up until Friday, that they had no concerns about our protest plans, that they were well aware of what we were going to do and they would engage with us and not disrupt us”.
He continued: “So they’ve repeatedly lied about their intentions, and I believe they had every intention of arresting us prior to doing so.”
Mr Smith also rejected suggestions his arrest, along with other protesters, was necessary to limit disruption to the Coronation.
Former cabinet minister David Davis was the only Conservative MP to vote against the changes to the Public Order Bill, which criminalised protesters using lock-on measures.
He said that the legislation should be scrutinised by the Home Affairs Select Committee to ensure it is understood and implemented fairly.
He told the Today programme: “There’s too many elements of the law that are too crude and too broadly defined.
“What the government said was that it expects the police to come up with standards of behaviour. That’s very woolly. If we’re going to do that, we should do it properly, do it centrally, with the same level of democracy in the whole country.
“No-one wants a day ruined, but the right to put up placards is virtually absolute in British democracy.”
Former Greater Manchester police chief Sir Peter Fahy said he gave evidence in parliament expressing his concern that the new law was “poorly defined and far too broad”.
“We see the consequences of that, particularly for the poor police officers who have to make sense of legislation that was only passed a few days ago,” he told the Today programme.
“This law could affect all sorts of protests in your local community, and this legislation could be used against you, and the police would be under pressure.
“The government have actually reduced the amount of discretion the police have in getting the balance right.”
Wrong
Shadow housing minister Lisa Nandy said “clearly something has gone wrong” in the handling of Mr Smith’s case, and expressed her support for a review into the matter, which has been requested by the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan.
However, she said Labour was not committing to “wholesale repeal” of the new law introduced by the Conservatives last week, which has been criticised for clamping down on the rights of peaceful protesters.
She told BBC Breakfast: “One of the questions we have is ‘why was it that this group were clearly in contact with the Met, had informed them about their plans, and yet still ended up arrested up and prevented from protesting?’.
“If there is a problem with the legislation, of course we’ll rectify that in government, but we’re not into wholesale repeal of legislation without understanding what the actual problem is first.”
Earlier, Met Police Federation chairman Ken Marsh said officers “police without fear or favour,” insisting the force had done “an incredible job” policing the Coronation.
He told the Today programme: “We have to take into consideration everything that at that moment is put in front of us. If individuals intend to cause an incident which will affect others near them or around them… then we take action to deal with it.
“Protesting can take place in this country, but it’s to the level of which you perform that protesting that we have to balance and deal with.”
Apology
The news comes as Republic chief executive Graham Smith said a chief inspector and two other Met officers personally apologised to him over what he called a “disgraceful episode”.
Health minister Neil O’Brien said officers “did a pretty good job”.
The Met issued a lengthy defence as it confirmed Mr Smith and five others have been told they face no further action after being stopped at 6.40am on Saturday.
Officers arrested the group using new powers under the much-criticised Public Order Act because they believed items found alongside a large number of placards could have been used as “lock-on devices” to cause disruption, the force said.
The arrests were deemed a direct attack on democracy” that shows the right to peacefully demonstrate “no longer exists”, the leader of an anti-monarchy group has said.
After 52 people were detained for conspiracy to cause a public nuisance and other public order offences, Republic’s Graham Smith said “every police officer involved on the ground should hang their heads in shame”.
Among the group’s members who felt “targeted” and silenced were nine people that held up signs reading “Not my King” at the Mall, moments before the procession left Buckingham Palace.
Although not arrested, they were whisked out of sight of the King and Queen into St James’s Park to be searched by Welsh police officers, outnumbering them roughly two-to-one.
Officers surrounded them and exchanged words before rifling through their pockets – some protesters faced the wall with their hands up in front of them.
Protester Harvey Woolf said: “I wasn’t very happy about the searches, I think we had been targeted because they didn’t want our message to get out.”
He continued: “What we are annoyed and disappointed about is that it was timed exactly to coincide with the point at which the carriage went down the Mall.”
Follow live coverage of the coronation
The 66-year-old said police told him the protesters were suspected of carrying paint, but an officer told Sky News they led the Republic members away to avoid a “hostile environment” created by the crowds.
Royal supporters had booed and shouted “shame on you” when the protesters were initially marched away from the Mall.
The Met and Welsh police were asked if it was policy to remove people who are subject to a “hostile environment”, rather than those creating it, but were not able to immediately respond to a request for comment.
The protesters had been standing still holding bright yellow signs above their heads, several rows back from the barricades lining the Mall, to object to what they called hereditary privilege and power.
AD: Heritage And Restaurant Lounge Bar