By Sheila Mckenzie-
Thomas Markle is an irresponsible and silly father, who lacks discretion after his renewed attack on his daughter and her husband.
Meghan Markle’s father publicly attacked his son-in-law Harry again, branding him a ‘candyass’ who would run if they had a fight.
The 77-year-old has many times criticised Harry for given up on his official duties, this time describing the decision from the Duke and Duchess Of Sussex as ”ridiculous”.
Speaking from his home in Rosario, Mexico, Mr Markl told The Sun: “Harry walked away from his responsibilities and that’s ridiculous. He walked away from his grandmother, the royals and the British people.
“He’s a candyass. I’d take him on at my age any time. He’d run away from me.”
Thomas Markle’s views are shared by royalists and most critics of the Sussexes, but fans of Prince Harry and Meghan believe the couple have defended the couple’s decision. The British public has long been divided on the royal family feud, but Mr.Markle’s latest attack on prince Harry openly presents him in bad light. His actions make the deep rift between him and his daughetr almost impossible to resolve.
Insulted: Prince Harry Image:news.sk
Thomas Markle, who has expressed his strong desire to meet his grandchild, appears to have given up on that goal, as he continues to court publicity without any proper assessment of the lasting damage his media contributions have on his relationship with his daughter.
The former film director’s deep unhappiness with his daughter continues to intensify the almost irreconcilable rift between them by engaging in a never ending public criticism against both the Duke And Duchess Of Sussex.
Mr Markle further attacked his daughter’s credibility by claiming she fabricates her childhood for political sway, The Sun reports.
His comments follow Meghan’s October campaign where she wrote to US politicians calling for paid parental leave, saying she “grew up on the $4.99 salad bar” at budget Sizzler family restaurants.
He attacked his daughter’s claim by insisting she never struggled financially for food. He added: “She’s never, ever, ever had to worry about anything like that in her life.”
‘
The former filmmaker said they ate at the best restaurants and only visited Sizzler, a low-cost chain, because it was convenient. They never had to ‘rub pennies together and only pick the salad bar’.
His attack can be seen as defending his family name on the arguable grounds that his daughter is misrepresenting the facts of her background, but his attack on Prince Harry was very unwise indeed.
Last week, the Court of Appeal upheld the ruling the The Mail on Sunday breached Meghan’s privacy by publishing a letter she wrote to her dad in 2018.
Mr Markle said he was upset by the ruling as it blocks him from telling his side of the story. He is now considering making a YouTube video to read the unpublished section of her letter.
He will be at liberty to publish the rest of the letter from her daughter to him on youtube, since the British press will avoid the risk publishing the unpublished section of the letter.
The fall out between Thomas Markle and his daughter began after he staged a newspaper story in 2018, just before the royal wedding.
Since then, he and his daughter have not spoken, instead, he has discredited her, and so have her two siblings.
The attack on Meghan Markle from her father is a bad reflection on her, and presents her as the dishonest woman her bitter critics already consider her to be.
His branding of Prince Harry as a candyass shows his deep anger at his daughter’s husband in him not seeing his grandchildren up until now, but equally shows him to be a very silly man.