By Ben Kerrigan-
The Court Of Appeal has ruled that Shamima Begum should be allowed to return to the UK to fight the decision to remove her British citizenship.
Ms Begum, 20 was one of three schoolgirls who left London to join the Islamic State group in Syria in 2015.
AD: Capeesh Restaurant
Her citizenship was revoked by the Home Office on security grounds after it emerged she had joined terrorist group ISIS.she was found in a refugee camp in 2019.
The Home Office said the decision was “very disappointing” and it would “apply for permission to appeal”.The Court of Appeal said she had been denied a fair hearing because she could not make her case from the Syrian camp.
The ruling means the government must now find a way to allow the 20-year-old, who is currently in Camp Roj in northern Syria, to appear in court in London despite repeatedly saying it would not assist removing her from Syria.
AD: Oysterian Sea Food Restaurant And Bar
Lord Justice Flaux – sitting with Lady Justice King and Lord Justice Singh – said: “Fairness and justice must, on the facts of this case, outweigh the national security concerns, so that the leave to enter appeals should be allowed.”
The judge also said that the national security concerns about her “could be addressed and managed if she returns to the United Kingdom”.
Daniel Furner, Ms Begum’s solicitor, said: “Ms Begum has never had a fair opportunity to give her side of the story.
“She is not afraid of facing British justice, she welcomes it. But the stripping of her citizenship without a chance to clear her name is not justice, it is the opposite.”
Among the consideration to the Court of Appeal’s decision was that the ongoing risk to Ms Begum’s life has not yet been properly considered.
Former Home Secretary Sajid Javid made the decision to strip Ms Begum of her citizenship in February 2019.
Ms Begum’s legal team challenged the move on three grounds – that it was unlawful because it left her stateless; it exposed her to a real risk of death or inhuman and degrading treatment; and she could not effectively challenge the decision while she was barred from returning to the UK.
International law legally forbids the revocation of an individual’s citizenship in circumstances where they are not entitled to citizenship of another country.
In February, a specialist tribunal – the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) – ruled that the decision to remove Ms Begum’s citizenship was lawful because she was “a citizen of Bangladesh by descent”.
Ms Belgium has a claim to Bangladeshi nationality through her mother.
In his ruling on Thursday, Lord Justice Flaux said: “It is difficult to conceive of any case where a court or tribunal has said we cannot hold a fair trial, but we are going to go on anyway.”
Government ‘shirked’ responsibilities
Human rights organisation Liberty, which intervened in Ms Begum’s appeal, welcomed the ruling, saying the right to a fair trial was “a fundamental part of our justice system and equal access to justice must apply to everyone”.
Liberty lawyer Katie Lines added: “Banishing someone is the act of a government shirking its responsibilities and it is critical that cruel and irresponsible government decisions can be properly challenged and overturned.”
AD: Heritage And Restaurant Lounge Bar