By Bethany Ruby Rose And Nikki Greener-
The British press is to be urged to refrain from glorifying Stormy Daniels, after the porn star became a world wide name following the revelation she slept with U.S President, Donald Trump.
A motion is to be circulated to editors of some of Britain’s powerful newspapers to warn of the contribution to degrading society. The Daily Express, The Daily Star, and the Metro, today published articles featuring an appearance by the 39-year-old at London’s G-A-Y nightclub, on Thursday, to judge their iconic Porn Idol contest.
A number of hopefuls performed in front of the former porn star and danced around a pole while stripping off their clothes. The game’s objective was to impress Stormy and the other members of the judging panel in order to be announced as cash winners. Plans for the circulated mail were made by members of the Eye Of Media.Com’s Think Tank team. It is not likely to go down well with media bosses, who may perceive the circulation as being tantamount to attempting to censor what the press can cover, but permission was today given for the critical circulation to go ahead next week.
The strongly worded communication will caution members of the British press to be conscious of the risks of glorifying individuals like stormy Daniels, who after receiving hush money of $130,000 has gone on to make a lot more money and became a celebrity in the porn world. The circulation will say that whilst there will always be a public interest to cover developments in her case with president Trump, or any criminal or business exploits unrelated to her stated affairs with Trump, spreading news about her appearances at various venues will amount to a glorification of her shameful act for sleeping with a married man and keeping the alleged dirty money she earned after breaking their agreement for hush money.
SPLIT
Members of our Think Tank team were split in opinion with some concluding that Daniels did the right thing in exposing an affair she insists took place, without returning the massive money. Some internal critics believe it is harsh for anyone to expect Daniels to have returned such a large sum of money despite her decision to break the alleged deal, but other critics believe Daniels should have at least given the money to charity if she wants to be held in any high regard. the latter group say it was extortionate, and promoting individuals like Daniels is not responsible journalism. However, all are unified in the belief that the British press should not glorify the American Porn Star. The team intend to also write to any of the American press seen to be glorifying the porn star, as part of The EYE Of Media.Com’s stance to uphold strong moral principles.