By Emily Caulkett-
Activists and campaigners have blasted a NewZealand decision to prevent a 12-year-old from the Philippines from moving to New Zealand due to her autism, despite the fact both her parents already having permanent residency .
Activists and campaigners have joined thousands of people to call for the decision to be overturned.
AD: Capeesh Restaurant
Arianna Alfonzo,(pictured) who has lived roughly 7800km away from her father, a construction industry worker in Auckland, was denied the chance of joining her parents who are based in Newzealand.
“It’s been very difficult for us,” said her mother, Gail Alfonzo, who has stayed with Arianna overseas to look after her. “She needs both parents.”
The poor girl was denied a visitor visa in 2018 after she was deemed not to have met the “acceptable standards of health”, an immigration policy that considers whether a person would cost the nation’s special education or healthcare systems more than $41,000.
AD: Oysterian Sea Food Restaurant And Bar
With the help of Green Party MP Ricardo Menéndez March, the family sought a reprieve late last year from Associate Immigration Minister Phil Twyford. There have been other cases in which families with autistic children have been initially denied a visa but later granted an exception, Menéndez March noted to his Parliament colleague in the November 16 letter.
“It should not take media attention to get the correct and just outcome,” he wrote.
“I have carefully considered your representations,” Twyford wrote. “I advise I am not prepared to intervene in this case.”
Twyford’s spokesperson for the associate minister declined to discuss individual cases.
Twyford’s response to the exception request caught the attention of Juliana Carvalho, who underwent her own years-long battle to gain residency after she was initially rejected on similar grounds.
Preparation
“I wonder what level of preparation it takes to hold a pen and sign a paper,” she wrote on her Change.org petition on behalf of the Alfonzo family, which is titled #LetAriannaStayNZ. “I wonder what kind of preparation is required to stop breaching this child’s basic human rights. I wonder what kind of preparation he needs to have some empathy for this family.”
Carvalho, who has lupus and is paraplegic, moved to New Zealand from Brazil on a student visa in 2012 after visiting siblings who had already immigrated. She “fell in love” with the country, she previously said. But in 2015, after applying for residency, she was found not to meet the acceptable standards of health clause and was rejected.
It took five years of appeals before a request for ministerial intervention in 2020 resulted in her receiving residency.
She described the “emotional toll of trying to prove that you add value” as “the worst thing that happened to my life” – a huge hit on her self-esteem even though she’s had steady employment, plays wheelchair rugby, drives her own car and does not receive any regular personal care.
“Being told repeatedly that you are a burden, that you add no value – it can make you believe,” she said. “I don’t want anyone else to go through this. I don’t want anyone else to feel the pain that I felt, the humiliation.
“This policy, it ruins people’s lives.”
“Honestly the emotional toll was worse than becoming paraplegic, in terms of mental health and suffering … This whole messaging that all you are [is] a burden, that you add no value – it has a huge impact on someone’s life,” she said. After beginning her time in New Zealand under a student visa, it took six years before Carvahlo was approved for residency.
“I am a very resourceful person with amazing friends, family, I have the support, and for me it was almost unbearable,” Carvalho said. “Now imagine for a child with a disability, who is building their identity – what is the impact of this messaging for children? And what is the impact of this messaging for all the other children with disabilities in this country
Carvalho befriended the Alfonzo family, and later became their vocal advocate, after Arianna’s mum read about Carvalho’s campaign for residency and reached out to her online.
“I think they deserve a break, really,” Carvalho said. “We don’t have any other option for this family. We have to keep fighting until the minister gets a bloody pen and signs the paper.”
The Alfonzos are far from the only family who have faced a similar situation, Carvalho said, arguing that the entire system needs reform.
/cloudfront-ap-southeast-2.images.arcpublishing.com/nzme/RFSY3K4H2XLQAKZ4FE6G3IRP7Y.jpg)
Parents Gail and Allan Alfonzo and their daughter Image: / Supplied
The #LetAriannaStayNZ petition, which has garnered over 2150 signatures so far, comes on the heels of a nearly 35,000-signature petition that Carvalho submitted to Parliament last year.
Systemic Discrimination
The petition includes a request from Carvalho to the Newzealand Government to “end systemic discrimination in the immigration systems by complying with the [United Nations] Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities”, which she noted New Zealand signed 14 years ago.
“She wants immigration policy to be considered within a wellbeing framework, centred on the lived experiences of immigrants with disabilities, and informed by manaaki (hospitality), utu (mutuality), and aroha (love),” the bipartisan Education Workforce Committee said of the petition in a report published in December.
“She wants visa applicants to be assessed according to their contributions to society, skills, and family ties, and not according to their potential costs to health and education services.”
The report noted that the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, which oversees Immigration NZ, believes the current health settings are appropriate. The ministry highlighted renal and residential care as examples of services that are already under pressure.
The Immigration and Protection Tribunal recently decided that the UN disability rights convention “does not impose a mandatory requirement” to grant residence to those with impairments “which may hinder their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others”.
But the committee report also noted that the Office of Disability Issues described linking disability to monetary cost as a “deficit-based approach” that is inconsistent with the New Zealand Disability Strategy. Rejecting a child’s visa application while accepting other family members’ creates an unenviable situation, the agency suggested.
The committee, chaired by Labour MP Marja Lubeck, concluded that there may be merit in some of Carvalho’s proposals.
“We recommend that the acceptable standard of health, which is used by Immigration New Zealand to inform their decision-making on applications, is reviewed so that the health requirements will be aligned to a strengths-based approach for disabilities and only screen for the most serious health conditions,” it suggested, thanking Carvalho for her advocacy and her “deeply personal” submissions.
Immigration matters, the Government noted last month in its response to Carvalho’s petition, are “inherently discriminatory as individuals will need to be treated based on personal characteristics”, the Newzealand government’s response said.
While the Government values the contributions of disabled people to New Zealand society, the current immigration health settings are appropriate because they focus on public health impacts, the four-page response noted.
“The Government considers that it is necessary to retain these settings to ensure that we do not significantly impact New Zealanders in the long-term.”
The Government conceded that the current $41,000 limit for potential burdens on the system caused by an applicant’s medical conditions could use a reassessment.
“The review is likely to find that the $41,000 threshold, which was set 10 years ago, no longer reflects what a high-cost medical condition currently looks like,” the response noted, adding that the review would be unlikely to “significantly change screening requirements”.
“Some conditions will likely always remain an impediment to being found to have an acceptable standard of health because of their cost and/or demand on limited resources, e.g. the need for cochlear implants, students requiring Ongoing Resource Scheme funding, conditions which require care in the community/residential care, and medical conditions requiring treatment with high-cost medications.”
Menéndez March, the Green Party’s immigration spokesman, has lambasted the government’s position. He insists that the whole policy needs an overhaul, starting with adopting the approach recommended by the cross-party Education Workforce Committee, he told the Herald while discussing the Alfonzo family’s case.
“We’ve been very clear that this policy borders on modern-day eugenics,” he said, adding that disabled immigrants shouldn’t have to seek help from MPs or the media to justify their value to society. “It’s a deeply dehumanizing process.”
While he said he shouldn’t have to fight for individual cases at all, he’s surprised an exception hasn’t been made for Arianna.
“We’re not giving up,” he said. “I hope that the minister sees the amazing potential of bringing this family together.”
‘A complete family’
Despite spending thousands of dollars on lawyer’s fees and specialist doctor reports, she and her husband still believe in the compassion of New Zealanders, she told the Herald in a video call from the Philippines.
AD: Heritage And Restaurant Lounge Bar