Litigant Who Alleges Murder And Paedophilia By Judges And Politicians Handed Restraint Order

Litigant Who Alleges Murder And Paedophilia By Judges And Politicians Handed Restraint Order

By Ashley Young-

A  persistent litigant who alleges that at least 10 judges are paedophiles and murderers , and who also made a host of other allegations against the police, politicians and the Royal Family – has been handed a third civil restraint order.

Mr Justice Pepperall imposed a fresh two-year order against Andrew Wardle, designed  to protect his former employers from ‘vexatious proceedings and to protect the finite resources of the court from vexatious waste’.

The court heard that Wardle had persisted in  his litigation  pursuits, which first started with a discrimination claim, which was struck out. An application to join the local chief constable was also thrown out, but the resilient litigant simply pressed on with more legal challenges.

Mr Wardle had also approached The Eye Of Media.Com twice in 2020, and once in 2019, with material containing the same claims, which he wanted us to publish. He strongly expressed the view that there were dangerous judges and politicians, who should be exposed.

However, Mr Eard;ewas asked to send detailed evidence of his claims. Publishing an article supporting Mr Wardle’s position would have required overwhelming evidence to support the serious claim.

After his second civil restraint order in 2019, Wardle created a website entitled ’Judicial Paedos’ and made serious allegations of paedophilia and corruption by a number of judges at all levels

. He claimed that circuit judges had been bribed by senior police officers to protect the true killer in the Soham murders. Further allegations of corruption were made against lawyers and court staff, and he continued to make accusations against former colleagues.

Pepperall J opted not to name any of the employees, police officers, judges, politicians, court staff or members of the Royal Family against whom allegations were made ‘without presenting a shred of evidence in support’.

The judge found that Wardle, if correct, would be on the verge of exposing the most extraordinary and serious evidence of corruption and criminality to have ever rocked the British establishment.

Far Fetched

He described this idea as ‘absurdly far-fetched’ and said Wardle’s actions over the past two years showed he remained fixated on his perceived injustices and had now drawn the ‘most preposterous conclusion that anyone with whom he comes into conflict is a serious criminal, paedophile and murderer’.

 

 

Spread the news
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.