By Aaron Miller-
Guidelines for an impeachment process against U.S president Donald Trump has been approved today by The House Committee.
The announcement evidences an avid plan to impeach U.S president Donald Trump
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler says there’s no confusion about the committee’s actions: It’s an impeachment investigation, no matter how you want to phrase it.
Nadler unequivocally said the committee approved guidelines for impeachment hearings on President Donald Trump . Some of Nadler’s fellow Democrats — including House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer — have stumbled over how to explain what they’re doing.
“Some call this process an impeachment inquiry. Some call it an impeachment investigation. There is no legal difference between these terms, and I no longer care to argue about the nomenclature,” Nadler, D-N.Y., said as he opened the meeting. “But let me clear up any remaining doubt: The conduct under investigation poses a threat to our democracy. We have an obligation to respond to this threat. And we are doing so.”
Republicans disagree with Nadler and they argue that the House has never voted to open an official inquiry. Georgia Rep. Doug Collins, the top Republican on the committee, said the committee “has become a giant Instagram filter it’s put in there to look like something, but it’s really not.”
Collins said Democrats are trying to have it both ways.
“My colleagues know very well they don’t have the votes to authorize impeachment proceedings on the House floor, but they want to impeach the president anyway,” Collins said. “So, they are pretending to initiate impeachment.”
The idea of impeaching the most vocal and controversial American president in living memory has been bandied around for a while , with Trump’s impulsive proclivity towards expressive views on social media a worry for many democrats for a long time. Recent probes about Trump’s past has tirelessly revolved around hush payments given to Stormy Daniels against a backdrop of alleged sexual affair and alleged clandestine arrangements and meetings with Russisan officials before the 2016 elections. Impeachment has divided Democrats who control the House. Democrats on Nadler’s committee, including some of the most liberal members of the House, have been eager to move forward with the process.
“It’s sucking the air out of all the good stuff that we’re doing, so that’s our concern,” said Florida Rep. Donna Shalala, who attended the meeting. She said very few constituents in her swing district asked her about impeachment over the August recess. Given those divisions, Nadler and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., have been talking about impeachment very differently.
The House Judiciary Committee is preparing for its first impeachment-related vote, set to define procedures for upcoming hearings on President Donald Trump even as some moderates in the caucus are urging the panel to slow down.
Nadler has been clear that his committee is moving ahead, Pelosi is reluctant to mention the “I” word and has repeatedly said the strategy is to “legislate, investigate and litigate.” In private meetings, she has urged caution and told the caucus that the public isn’t there yet on impeachment.
At the same time, she has signed off on the committee’s moves.
The confusion was highlighted Wednesday when Hoyer, D-Md., indicated to reporters that there was not an impeachment investigation — and then issued a clarification saying he thought the question was “in regards to whether the full House is actively considering articles of impeachment, which we are not at this time.” He said he supported the committee’s work.
The announced guidelines for an impeachment process will need to go beyond a committee’s investigation to become any kind of bombshell development. The Committee may be working towards this scenario. They would have to introduce impeachment articles against Trump and win approval from the House to bring charges. The Republican-led Senate is unlikely to convict Trump and remove him from office.