By Aaron Miller And Isabelle Wilson-
The US government has been urged to disclose evidence of UFOs after a whistleblower former intelligence official said the government has possession of “intact and partially intact” alien vehicles.
The whistle blower is trying to uncover an 80-plus-year cover up about the truth about UFOs or, as they are now known, Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
It follows the claim by former intelligence official David Grusch, who led analysis of unexplained anomalous phenomena (UAP) within a US Department of Defense agency, has alleged that the US has craft of non-human origin.
Grutsch is a decorated war veteran who worked with both the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency and the National Reconnaissance Office, where he worked as on the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force with top clearance levels.
Grusch told the Debrief that information about these mysterious vehicles is being unlawfully withheld from Congress , adding that when he turned over classified information about the vehicles to Congress he suffered retaliation from government officials. He left the government in April after a 14-year career in US intelligence.
He insists that the recoveries of partial fragments through and up to intact vehicles have been made for decades through the present day by the government, its allies, and defense contractors.
Analysis has evidenced the objects retrieved to be “of exotic origin (non-human intelligence, whether extraterrestrial or unknown origin) based on the vehicle morphologies and material science testing and the possession of unique atomic arrangements and radiological signatures,” he said.
In filing his complaint, Grusch is represented by a lawyer who served as the original Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG).
“We are not talking about prosaic origins or identities,” Grusch said, referencing information he provided Congress and the current ICIG. “The material includes intact and partially intact vehicles.”
In accordance with protocols, Grusch provided the Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review at the Department of Defense with the information he intended to disclose to us. His on-the-record statements were all “cleared for open publication” on April 4 and 6, 2023, in documents provided to us.
Grutch is not isolated in his mega claims. Another generational officer of the United States Intelligence Community who currently works for the National Air and Space Intelligence Center (NASIC), where the analysis of UAP has been his focus has a wealth of experience in serving Private Aerospace and Department of Defense Special Directive Task Forces.
He said: “The non-human intelligence phenomenon is real. We are not alone,” Grey said. “Retrievals of this kind are not limited to the United States. This is a global phenomenon, and yet a global solution continues to elude us.”
White House Silence
During a press briefing today, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, dodged a reporter’s question about extraterrestrial life
Jonathan Grey, a current US intelligence official at the National Air and Space Intelligence Center (Nasic), confirmed the existence of “exotic materials” to the Debrief, adding: “We are not alone.”
In 2021, the Pentagon released a report on UAP – the term is preferred to UFO by much of the extraterrestrial community , following over 140 inexplicable encounters that could not b
In an interview with the Debrief journalists Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal, who previously exposed the existence of a secret Pentagon program that investigated UFOs, Grusch said the US government and defense contractors had been recovering fragments of non-human craft, and in some cases entire craft, for decades.
“We are not talking about prosaic origins or identities,” Grusch said. “The material includes intact and partially intact vehicles.”
Grusch told the Debrief that analysis determined that this material is “of exotic origin” – meaning “non-human intelligence, whether extraterrestrial or unknown origin”.
“[This assessment is] based on the vehicle morphologies and material science testing and the possession of unique atomic arrangements and radiological signatures,” Grusch said.
Grey, who, according to the Debrief, analyzes unexplained anomalous phenomena within the Nasic, confirmed Grusch’s account.
“The non-human intelligence phenomenon is real. We are not alone,” Grey said. “Retrievals of this kind are not limited to the United States. This is a global phenomenon, and yet a global solution continues to elude us.”.
Nick Pope, a veteran of Ufo investigation for the British Ministry of Defence (MoD), added weight to the account of aline material by Grusch , describing it as “very significant”.
“It’s one thing to have stories on the conspiracy blogs, but this takes it to the next level, with genuine insiders coming forward,” Pope said.
“When these people make these formal complaints, they do so on the understanding that if they’ve knowingly made a false statement, they are liable to a fairly hefty fine, and/or prison.
“People say: ‘Oh, people make up stories all the time.’ But I think it’s very different to go before Congress and go to the intelligence community inspector general and do that. Because there will be consequences if it emerges that this is not true.”
The Debrief reported that Grusch’s knowledge of non-human materials and vehicles was based on “extensive interviews with high-level intelligence officials”. He said he had reported the existence of a UFO material “recovery program” to Congress.
“Grusch said that the craft recovery operations are ongoing at various levels of activity and that he knows the specific individuals, current and former, who are involved,” the Debrief reported.
In 1, a report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence said that from 2004 to 2021 there were 144 encounters between military pilots and UAP, 80 of which were captured on multiple sensors. Only one of the 144 encounters could be explained with “high confidence” – it was a large, deflating balloon.
Following increased interest from the public and some US senators, the Pentagon established the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, charged with tracking UAP, in July 2022.
In December last year, the office said it had received “several hundred” new reports, but no evidence so far of alien life.
Many witnesses and enthusiasts in the U.S who have pushed for alien disclosure claim to have suffered hinderances in their careers.
“Harassment only leads to further stigmatization of the UAP field, significantly hindering the scientific progress and discouraging others to study this important subject matter,” Nasa’s science chief, Nicola Fox, said in a public meeting on 31 May.
Speculation
Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs) have been a subject of fascination and speculation for decades. While many UFO sightings can be attributed to natural or man-made phenomena, there have been claims that some UFOs are actually intact alien vehicles. These claims suggest that extraterrestrial beings are visiting Earth and possess advanced technology. This essay delves into the topic of claims regarding intact alien vehicles in UFO phenomena and examines the evidence and scepticism surrounding these assertions.
Throughout history, there have been numerous accounts of UFO sightings and encounters with alleged alien vehicles. Some of these reports describe unidentified craft exhibiting extraordinary flight capabilities and characteristics beyond the capabilities of human-made technology. These accounts, often recounted by credible witnesses, contribute to the intrigue and speculation surrounding the existence of intact alien vehicles.
These accounts, often recounted by credible witnesses have contribute to the intrigue and speculation surrounding the existence of intact alien vehicles.
Roswell Incident
One of the most famous incidents related to claims of intact alien vehicles is the Roswell incident of 1947. It involved the crash of an unidentified object in Roswell, New Mexico. Initial reports suggested that it was a “flying disc,” sparking theories about extraterrestrial involvement. While the U.S. military eventually stated that the wreckage was from a weather balloon, conspiracy theories persist, asserting that the wreckage was, in fact, an alien spacecraft.
Supporters of the claims argue that eyewitness testimonies from reliable sources provide compelling evidence. Witnesses often describe seeing UFOs exhibiting unconventional flight patterns, such as sudden acceleration, instantaneous stops, and sharp changes in direction. They also report seeing craft that emit unusual lights or lack visible means of propulsion. These testimonies, while subjective, contribute to the belief in intact alien vehicles.
Physical Traces
Another aspect supporting the claims of intact alien vehicles involves alleged physical traces left behind after UFO encounters. Some reports mention the presence of unusual substances, such as trace metals or strange biological samples, at alleged UFO landing sites or crash sites. These anomalies are seen as potential evidence of extraterrestrial technology. However, skeptics argue that many of these claims lack proper scientific scrutiny and rigorous investigation.
Scepticism and Alternative Explanations
Sceptics have long sought to counter the claims of intact alien vehicles by offering alternative explanations for UFO sightings. They argue that many sightings can be attributed to misidentifications of natural phenomena, aircraft, satellites, or experimental military technology. Moreover, they emphasize that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and the lack of verifiable, tangible evidence for intact alien vehicles remains a significant challenge to these claims.
Scientific Method and Rigorous Investigation
The scientific community emphasizes the importance of applying the scientific method and conducting rigorous investigations to test claims. UFO phenomena, including claims of intact alien vehicles, require careful scrutiny, analysis of physical evidence, and replication of results. While some organizations, such as the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON), collect and investigate UFO reports, the scientific community as a whole have remained cautious about drawing definitive conclusions without robust empirical evidence.