By David Young-
Growing frustration over parcel delivery standards has prompted a local MP to challenge one of the UK’s largest courier firms at a critical time for online shoppers.
Gloucester’s Member of Parliament, Alex McIntyre, has written to parcel delivery company Evri to express deep concern about what he described as “poor service” being experienced by residents across the city, particularly as the festive season intensifies.
The intervention reflects mounting dissatisfaction among constituents who fear that gifts and essential purchases may not arrive on time or at all ahead of Christmas.
In a letter sent this week to Evri’s management, McIntyre detailed a range of problems reported by residents including delayed deliveries, abandoned packages left in plain sight, and parcels marked as delivered with no proof that they ever reached their intended destination.
His move underscores not only local frustration but a broader pattern of complaints about the performance of the courier service across the UK.
McIntyre’s office confirmed that the issues raised span multiple neighbourhoods with constituents contacting him repeatedly to describe stressful experiences around online shopping orders.
The MP voiced particular concern that time-sensitive parcels containing Christmas gifts could be left exposed or simply never arrive, compounding pressure on families trying to organise seasonal plans.
In his correspondence with Evri, he also criticised what he characterised as a company culture that incentivises speed over care, suggesting that drivers may be pushed to complete high volumes of deliveries in order to make a viable living.
Evri has acknowledged that there have been service problems in the Gloucester area and apologised to customers affected by delivery issues. In a statement responding to the MP’s concerns, the company said it recognises “some service issues” tied to third-party support workers brought in to handle increased parcel volumes during this busy period.
Evri maintained that handling every parcel with care remains a priority and encouraged anyone needing assistance to contact its customer service team.
Concerns Escalate Across the UK
While McIntyre’s intervention focuses on Gloucester, similar complaints have emerged across the UK, where other MPs have also taken up constituent grievances with Evri. In recent days, several members of Parliament in the South East highlighted widespread reports of parcels being “dumped” in unsafe or inappropriate locations, incorrectly marked as delivered, or left without contact from the courier.
Gosport MP Dame Caroline Dinenage and colleagues described parcels abandoned on roadsides and in random spots with the stress of undelivered items rising as Christmas draws near. They have called on Evri to investigate and improve its operations urgently.
These regional criticisms add to broader national scrutiny of Evri’s performance. Reports from various constituencies including calls from MPs in Lancashire and Wales have stressed similar themes of delayed or misplaced deliveries and inadequate communication from the company.
Some MPs have urged the company’s chief executive to take meaningful action to ensure parcels arrive safely and on time.
The backdrop to these political interventions is a mounting wave of consumer complaints that appears to extend beyond occasional service glitches. Independent surveys have previously shown low customer satisfaction ratings for Evri relative to other UK parcel companies, and anecdotal accounts from social media users and online forums depict a range of delivery woes, from parcels reportedly left exposed in poor weather to items marked as delivered but never received.
Evri’s surge in deliveries in recent months has been attributed to expanding online commerce and a rise in parcel volumes, particularly during peak seasonal periods.
The company has reported substantial increases in the number of parcels processed compared with previous years a trend that reflects wider consumer behaviour but also places significant operational pressure on logistics networks.
For small businesses that rely on dependable courier services to meet customer expectations, delivery failures can have a tangible financial impact.
Some Hampshire MPs have specifically noted how missed or incorrect deliveries have harmed independent retailers, with the stress of replacing lost goods or managing customer dissatisfaction compounding commercial challenges.
Drivers, Delivery Models and Customer Trust
A recurring theme in the criticism of Evri’s service relates to how the company manages its delivery workforce. Many couriers operate as independent contractors under a pay-per-parcel system, a model that has drawn scrutiny within political and media circles.
Critics may argue that this structure can pressure couriers to prioritise quantity over care, as earnings are linked directly to the number of parcels delivered rather than the quality of service provided.
McIntyre’s letter referenced concerns that drivers may earn below minimum wage after accounting for the demands of high parcel volumes, a claim that aligns with broader industry commentary this year about compensation models and workplace pressures within parcel delivery firms.
In at least one constituency outside Gloucester, MPs have cited such issues as part of a wider pattern that influences service outcomes and worker welfare.
Evri has defended its operational practices in past statements, emphasising investments in technology, tracking systems and new hires intended to cope with peak periods. The company insists that its focus remains on delivering parcels responsibly and resolving service issues where they arise.
However, as MPs continue to raise concerns, questions persist about whether current measures are sufficient to maintain customer confidence.
As Parliament reconvenes in the New Year, some lawmakers have suggested that formal debates or inquiries into parcel delivery standards and industry practices may be warranted.
The escalating volume of constituent feedback and cross-constituency engagement with Evri signals that delivery performance is not just a matter of local irritation but a national conversation about logistics reliability, worker conditions and regulatory oversight.
For residents of Gloucester and beyond, the immediate hope is that the heightened political attention will prompt tangible improvements in delivery reliability before the peak festive period concludes. Only time will tell whether these interventions lead to better outcomes for couriers and customers alike.
In the meantime, constituents waiting for parcels whether personal gifts or essential items remain understandably anxious about when and how their deliveries will arrive.
McIntyre’s actions reflect a broader demand for accountability that spans political lines, tapping into a collective concern about consumer rights, service standards and the operational realities of UK parcel networks in an era dominated by online shopping.



