By Aaron Miller-
Amber Heard’s lawyers have said that they believe the jury in the defamation case brought against the actress by her ex-husband Johnny Depp was “confused,” and Heard plans to appeal.
Heard’s Lawyer Elaine Bredehoft also told NBC’s Today show that Heard was “unable to pay” the damages, and claimed evidence had been suppressed.
Despite some of the anomalies in Heard’s testimony, she is convinced the courts got it wrong, and valid evidence which could have tilted the balance in the case was left out of the case. She has expressed pity for the potential implications on women if they won’t believe.
However, advocates of Depp see Heard as a conniving liar who has been exposed and can’t face the consequences. So the suggestion from Heard’s side is that the whole drama might play out again in a different court on a future date. If she goes through her plans, the dice will roll towards double embarrassment or vindication if she pulls something out of the bag.
In a blockbuster verdict, a jury in Virginia on Wednesday awarded Depp more than $10 million in damages. In a split decision, Heard also won a $2 million verdict against Depp, leaving her owing him a little more than $8 million.
A very disappointed Heard described the ruling a setback, because that’s exactly what it means,” she told NBC’s Savannah Guthrie. “Unless you pull out your phone and you video your spouse or your significant other beating you, effectively you won’t be believed.”
Ms Bredehoft also explained that “an enormous amount of evidence was suppressed” during the weeks-long trial in Fairfax, Virginia.
“Really what happened here is it’s a tale of two trials. Johnny Depp brought a suit in the UK for the same case,” she said in reference to Mr Depp’s 2020 UK libel case against The Sun, which had labeled him a “wife beater” over Ms Heard’s allegations.
“The burden of proof was easier for him there, The Sun had to actually prove that it was true. And the court found there — and we weren’t allowed to tell the jury this — but the court found that Mr Depp had committed at least 12 acts of domestic violence, including sexual violence against Amber.
“So what did Depp’s team learn from this? Demonize Amber and suppress the evidence. We had an enormous amount of evidence that was suppressed in this case that was in the UK case. In the UK case when it came in, Amber won and Mr Depp lost.”
Among the evidence suppressed were “very significant” medical records which showed “a pattern going all the way back to 2012 of Amber reporting this to her therapist”, Ms Bredehoft said.
The attorney then went on to speculate that jurors may have been influenced by the “lopsided” social media frenzy around the case, which skewed dramatically in Mr Depp’s favour.
“How can you not[be influenced]?” she asked. “They went home every night. They have families. The families are on social media. We had a 10-day break in the middle because of the judicial conference. There’s no way they couldn’t have been influenced by it.”
Ms Bredehoft confirmed that Ms Heard will be filing appeal, saying: “She has some excellent grounds for it.”
She added that Ms Heard will “absolutely not” be able to pay the millions in damages awarded to her ex-husband.
The Aquaman actress reacted to the verdict herself in a statement on Wednesday afternoon saying she was “heartbroken”.
“The disappointment I feel today is beyond words. I’m heartbroken that the mountain of evidence still was not enough to stand up to the disproportionate power, influence, and sway of my ex-husband,” she said.
“I’m even more disappointed with what this verdict means for other women. It is a setback. It sets back the clock to a time when a woman who spoke up and spoke out could be publicly shamed and humiliated. It sets back the idea that violence against women is to be taken seriously.”
Her lawyer, Bredehoft , said of the verdict. “A number of things were allowed in this court that should not have been allowed, and it caused the jury to be confused.”