Price Transparency By UK Law Firms Have Only Slightly Impacted Competition Outcomes

Price Transparency By UK Law Firms Have Only Slightly Impacted Competition Outcomes

By Gabriel Princewill-

Price transparency imposed on UK law firms to publish information on prices has so far had very limited impact on competition and outcomes, the competition watchdog has said today.

The watchdog’s evaluation of progress since its 2016 market study, which  concluded the legal services sector was not working well for consumers,  has made insufficient progress , and needs to advance further. The Competition and Markets Authority has today said  more work needs to be done on transparency. It also calls for reform of the Legal Services Act, saying the case is ‘compelling’.

Capeesh Restaurant

AD: Capeesh Restaurant

The review found ‘clear signs of progress’, saying that many more firms provide information to help clients shop around.

Although the report signalled ‘Clear signs of progress’, with more firms providing information to help clients shop around, the CMA  has now recommended that the Legal Services Board (LSB), working with other regulators, continues to build on the reforms and tackle some of the 2016 recommendations that ‘still require progression’, such as providing more information on quality.

It said that: ‘However, while the evidence suggests that some customers are taking advantage of the changes, there is still work to do as there only appears to have been a limited impact on the intensity of competition between providers and on sector outcomes.’

Oysterian Sea Food Restaurant And Bar

AD: Oysterian Sea Food Restaurant And Bar

On regulatory reform, the review notes that the government has not acted on its call for a regulatory review of the Legal Services Act 2007. ‘The CMA considers that the case for reform remains pressing, particularly as there are signs of growth in the unregulated sector, and therefore remains of the view that wholesale reform of the act is necessary.’

Solicitors in different law firms charge a variety of prices, depending on the experience and expertise of solicitors, but there has been concerns of excessive charges from some law firms.

Solicitors and legal executives in London with over 8 years’ experience charge  £409 per hour under the highest grade 1. Under grade 2, they charge £317 an hour,  but fall to  £229–£267 an hour under London grade 2 charge £296 ,but  solicitors and legal executives with over 4 years’ experience, but less than 7 years experience charge £229 an hour.

In the absence of a government to commitment to reform, the CMA suggests shorter term steps to achieve reform in stages. It proposes that:

The Ministry of Justice has established a mandatory public register of unregulated providers, requiring them to provide appropriate redress;
The LSB review reserved activities ‘to ensure that such restrictions are necessary and proportionate’.

Further Progress

Andrea Coscelli, the CMA’s chief executive said: ‘It is positive to see changes that have already been made, but more progress is needed. We encourage the Ministry of Justice, the Legal Services Board and other legal services regulators to continue to work towards reform and to make sure the sector works well for consumers long into the future.’

The Law Society said the review showed that the solicitor profession has made great advances in transparency but risk of consumer harm continues in the unregulated sector.

Law Society president, David Greene said ;’We’ve had very constructive engagement with the CMA during this review, they have clearly listened to us and recognise the progress made by law firms.’

He added that any further reforms ‘should not only focus on competition outcomes, but also on the public interest, the rule of law, access to justice, and an independent, strong, diverse and effective legal profession – all of which are regulatory objectives under the Legal Services Act’.

While competition may drive down costs, Greene said ‘there are few winners in a race to the bottom where low cost may be offset by consumer harm’.

‘A review of the unregulated sector could identify high risk areas and specific harms to inform the development of workable and effective regulatory interventions. The current legal regulatory framework is sufficiently flexible for improvements to be made where there is evidence of consumer harm, including through regulation,’ he said.

Heritage And Restaurant Lounge Bar

AD: Heritage And Restaurant Lounge Bar

 

Spread the news