By Sheila Mckenzie-
A professional researcher has blasted Meghan Markle and the Black Lives Matters Movement, labelling both as hypocrites in an angry rant during a discussion about Piers Morgan, the royal family, and criticism.
The lady who insisted on having her name changed after being photographed for this article is an intelligent professional, married to a well- known millionaire business man in the UK, whose identity we cannot reveal.
She is among a number of professionals who contributed to The Eye Of Media.Com’s Think tank group last weekend, comprising both internal members of this publication, and some external professionals who periodically discuss complex issues before the going to press.
She gave a controversial but candid contribution to a crises that has divided the nation. After her contribution which she knew before hand would be the topic of an article for this publication, the high flying woman insisted on her name being excluded from this article, arguing the matter intensely.
Her views will form a thorough and long term assessment of the feud that has engulfed the royal family be cause of the rift between the Duke and Duchess Of Sussex, and the rest of the royal family. which sparked public emotions.
Meghan Markle’s popularity in the UK has taken a hit since her Oprah Winfrey interview, which divided opinion widely. The outpouring of opinion on Meghan Markle since has been overwhelming , with opinions for and against her intense on both sides.
Opinions are getting stronger, with some some of Piers Morgan’s critics supporting him against in the war against Meghan Markle, which her critics say she really is at fault for.
Ms J called for both Meghan Markle and The Black Lives Matters movement in general to be held to account for hypocrisy. She said that Piers Morgan had been right about many things and that Meghan Markle should be closely examined for her the impact of her interview.
Sensitive Topics
A number of professionals had met up in East London for comprehensive discussion about hot and sensitive topics, when the outspoken woman who has always wanted on voice on big matters, took over the show with her dogmatic views, many of them at least backed up by some factual information.
Although her photograph is her real identity, she expressed fear of reprisals from BLM, whom she said could be dangerous and could trace her to her home. She also expressed concern that if her name were ever to be associated with this story on search engines, it could affect her highly paid profession.
The 38 year old researcher and business woman accused Meghan Markle of bringing her hereditary family discord to the royal family, condemning her as bad news and a trouble maker, whose own family is full of friction.
Sipping a glass of wine as she addressed some of the matters at hand, she fumed: ”Meghan Markle’s family is in tartars and she has brought her destructive quarrelsome and friction traits to the royal family.
”Her half-sister hasn’t spoken to her in nearly a decade, and she hasn’t spoken to her dad ever since she got married. This is the same man who paid her private school fees and acting lessons . All of a sudden, she joins the royal family and there is bad blood among them.
Accused of hypocrisy Image: glamour.com
Piers Morgan was right, she is a user and hypocrite. She is now writing a book about fathers and sons to be published this summer, but the woman isn’t even talking to her own father. What a fxxxxxx hypocrite she is.
She lied about so much, the claim to have married three days earlier was all nonsense.
Raising he voice passionately, Ms Jackson said, ‘well she should still have shut her mouth, it’s an insult to the British public who forked out millions for the wedding..
Oprah Attack
She attacked Oprah for the claim made by Meghan Markle during the Oprah Winfrey interview that her son will not be prince because he is black. Why didn’t Oprah not establish the facts? establish the facts before broadcasting such a damaging claim?
Her questions are good, but has not been put to Oprah Winfrey. Whether Oprah Winfrey could have established the facts before airing the claim is a new subject of interest.
Oprah Winfrey Image: Pininterest
An unclear aspect right now is why Prince Harry did not know that his son was not entitled to become a prince, and conduct a simple examination of whether .
Critics of the couple believe that it was a lie concocted by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to make the royal family look bad, but other analysts say it Prince Harry would have been told his son would it be a prince.
The full context of the conversation can shed any light on the matter, but the error of fact in the account of Meghan Markle on that subject was considered to raise multiple unanswered questions. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were clearly wrong on that, leaving the void of how they got their facts wrong.
She is a trouble maker. She is the problem. She has come there and tried to take over”.
Black Lives Matter
Ms Maryln then turned her attention to the Black Lives Matters Movement, accusing them of being hypocrites.
Do you know how many rich black people there are? How many of them are helping their own? What has Oprah Winfrey done for black people? She just made £7m from Broadcasting Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s interview, but how much is she helping black people in America?
BLM movement goes on about racism, but you have black people killing black people all the time, look at that woman who found the Black Loves Matters, she spent £3m on property in Los Angeles, she can’t even account for. Is that not hypocrisy?
The Eye Of Media.Com contacted Louis Collier, on the week of the story to further probe the story, but decided to pause on any further probe after she revealed she had received death threats, facebook had removed posts shared by The Daily Mail which included pictures of her property.
Secondary Examination
The whole topic might now be given a secondary examination, on the grounds that organisation should be immune to legitimate criticism .
The boisterous lady was piercing in the delivery of her view. She revealed that she had been taken off facebook once or twice for expressing her opinion on controversial criticisms against the group. She attacked facebook for removing shared posts of those who had shared the Daily Mail’s story anout the co-founder of Black Loves Matter.
Ms J said: ”I’m sorry, but facebook are a confused lot, why would they remove the right of those expressing their right to free speech from their platform because people are sharing the truth about the founder of a movement that is supposed to help black people. The reality is that she is a hypocrite and so is the movement in many ways.