By Chris Williamson-
Families living in asylum hotels across the United Kingdom have spoken out with increasing urgency about the toll that substandard accommodation and insufficient nutrition have taken on their children’s physical and mental wellbeing.
Long-term reliance on hotel rooms as temporary asylum housing, driven by government contracts with private providers that have generated hundreds of millions in profit, has prompted criticism from residents, charities and health professionals concerned that the health of the most vulnerable especially children is being jeopardised as a result.
Parents in multiple cities report that prolonged stays in these facilities have left their children malnourished, emotionally distressed and facing ongoing health challenges.
These experiences sit against a backdrop of broader evidence suggesting that the UK’s current model of asylum accommodation, originally intended to be short-term, is being stretched far beyond its capacity, with significant consequences for residents’ wellbeing and development.
One mother described how her children, who arrived in the UK seeking safety, were unable to eat most of the food provided by hotel catering services. Her 14-year-old son lost a considerable amount of weight and required hospital treatment due to poor nutrition, while all three of her children suffered ongoing unhappiness and stress related to their living conditions.
Other families recount similar experiences of restricted diets, inadequate healthcare access and the broader psychological strain caused by long stays in cramped, institutionalised environments.
The Refugee Council, which compiled a report based on interviews with hundreds of asylum seekers, has highlighted these stories as emblematic of systemic problems with the way asylum hotels operate.
With nearly 9,000 people still housed in hotel accommodation while awaiting decisions on their asylum claims, many face months of uncertainty, limited social interaction and poor quality food that fails to meet nutritional needs, particularly for growing children.
Systemic Strain and Health Consequences in Asylum Hotels
Multiple investigations and reports have documented how hotels, originally designed for short stays, have become long-term housing for families. Child health specialists have warned that prolonged use of such accommodation can have detrimental effects on physical development and overall wellbeing.
One family’s experience of children losing weight and becoming depressed reflects wider patterns of health issues reported across different facilities, with doctors expressing concern about the lack of nutritious food and proper oversight.
A recent analysis by the Refugee and Migrant Forum of Essex & London (RAMFEL) echoes these concerns, revealing that complaints about food quality, insufficient facilities and poor oversight are widespread. The report documents hundreds of complaints about meals, many from families who say that children are undernourished or that the food provided lacks the nutrients needed for healthy growth.
In some cases, residents say they have sought medical attention because of the adverse effects of the diet, while others report that children have not gained weight appropriately.
Health professionals have long warned that hotel accommodation is unsuitable for long stays, particularly for families with young children.
A joint statement from the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health and other international child health groups emphasises that children in asylum systems require environments that support their physical and emotional development, which temporary hotel settings often fail to provide.
Although asylum hotels are supposed to offer meals and basic amenities, many families say the quality and variety of food are severely lacking. Some children struggle to eat what is provided because it is not age-appropriate or nutritious enough, forcing families to rely on limited financial allowances or external support from charities just to secure basics like baby food or fresh produce.
Advocates argue that this deficiency directly impacts children’s health and undermines their growth, especially during formative years.
The psychological impact of prolonged hotel accommodation is another common theme. Many parents describe their children as suffering from anxiety, depression or behavioural problems after months in settings that provide minimal space, privacy or normal social interaction.
One asylum seeker told researchers that her children often felt too isolated or distressed to leave their rooms for days at a time, a troubling sign of the emotional toll sustained uncertainty and cramped living conditions can have on young minds.
The accumulation of these experiences has prompted calls from charities and human rights organisations for the government to drastically overhaul the asylum accommodation system.
This argue that using hotels as long-term housing represents a fundamental misunderstanding of what is required to safeguard child health and wellbeing, especially given the traumas many families have already endured in fleeing conflict and persecution.
At the same time, the financial incentives embedded in the current system have come under scrutiny. Reports estimate that the Home Office’s three main hotel accommodation providers made a combined profit of £380 million between 2019 and 2024, despite repeated pledges from successive governments to reduce reliance on hotel housing.
Advocates argue that this substantial profitability stands in stark contrast to the poor conditions experienced by asylum seekers, many of whom pay a high personal price for what has become a lucrative business model.. This dynamic has fuelled accusations that private contractors are benefiting financially from a system that leaves families trapped in inadequate environments, while contracted profits grow.
Although government officials stress that contracts are intended to ensure basic accommodation provision, the reality reported by residents paints a different picture: one where profit margins may be prioritised over the health and welfare of vulnerable people. VisaVerge
Politically, the issue of asylum hotels has become a flashpoint in debates about immigration policy, housing shortages and public spending. Ministers have pledged to phase out hotel accommodation by 2029 in favour of purpose-built or community-based housing solutions, with the aim of saving taxpayers billions and improving conditions for asylum seekers.
However, implementation has been slow, and critics argue that the current crisis persists because of a lack of urgent action to cut through bureaucratic delays and contractual complexities that bind providers to the status quo.
Local authorities and community groups have also raised concerns about the sustainability of housing asylum seekers in hotels, noting that these arrangements create additional strain on public services and fail to foster integration or community connection.
Councils have documented problems ranging from overcrowding to difficulties accessing healthcare and schooling, particularly for children whose education is disrupted by frequent moves between accommodations.
Despite the pressures, families continue to hope for change. Many advocate for quicker transfers into permanent dispersal housing, improved oversight of hotel catering and living conditions, and better tailored support services that recognise the unique needs of children.
There is growing consensus among experts that safeguarding the health and development of young asylum seekers requires more than emergency shelter; it demands sustained investment in quality housing, nutritious food, healthcare access and psychosocial support.
The testimonies of families whose children have suffered weight loss, illness or emotional distress highlight the urgent need for reform. Their stories illustrate the human cost of a policy that has placed short-term accommodation solutions ahead of long-term wellbeing.
The experiences of these residents will continue to be crucial to calls for a system that prioritizes health, dignity, and opportunity for everyone seeking safety in the UK as the asylum housing debate rages on.



