By Sheila Mckenzie-
The defence barrister representing Constance Marten, a fugitive mother accused alongside her partner Mark Gordon of the manslaughter of their newborn daughter Victoria has branded her portrayal as a “monster” by the prosecution as unjust.
The high-profile trial at the Old Bailey has captured public attention as Marten and Gordon stand accused of manslaughter by gross negligence, perverting the course of justice, concealing the birth of a child, child cruelty, and causing or allowing the death of a child.
Marten’s barrister, Francis FitzGibbon KC, delivered a compelling closing speech, vehemently contesting the prosecution’s portrayal of his client.
He characterized Victoria’s death as a “terrible, tragic accident,” dismissing the prosecution’s allegations of negligence or malice.
“What happened to Victoria was no crime but rather a terrible, tragic accident,” asserted FitzGibbon, countering the prosecution’s claims that Victoria was exposed to cold wintry conditions or smothered.
He further lambasted the prosecution’s approach, accusing them of pursuing the case against Marten in an “aggressive, bullish way.” FitzGibbon argued that the prosecution’s characterization of Marten as “reckless, utterly selfish, callous, cruel and arrogant” was grossly inaccurate and intended to prejudice the jurors against her.
Contrary to the prosecution’s portrayal, FitzGibbon painted Marten as a grieving mother who had endured public scrutiny and relentless pursuit by authorities following the tragic events.
He highlighted Marten’s emotional police interview, where she expressed genuine grief upon learning of her baby’s discovery, as evidence of her innocence and humanity.
FitzGibbon urged jurors not to be swayed by sensationalism or prejudice but to consider the evidence impartially. He emphasized Marten’s love for all her children and her genuine sense of responsibility, refuting any notion of guilt or wrongdoing on her part.